| |||||||||||
Find Experts & Sources
Media ResourcesSubject Index Releases List Event Calendar Submit a news release or Calendar event Include yourself in SOURCESFAQ Membership Form Be an Affiliate Powerful Tools Tell your story Media Directory Media Releases Sources Bookshelf Sources Newsstand Subscriptions Connexions Radical Digressions Sources HotLink Sources Select Resources Twitter Download PDFs Contact |
Media Releases from members of Sources.
To submit a news release, use this form. EFF Asks Court to Reverse Chelsea Manning's Conviction for Violating Federal Anti-Hacking LawMay 28, 2016Fort Belvoir, Virginia -- The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) asked a U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals Wednesday to overturn Chelsea Manning's conviction for violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), arguing that the law is intended to punish people for breaking into computers systems -- something Manning didnt do.Manning is serving a 35-year sentence for her role in the release of approximately 700,000 military and diplomatic records to Wikileaks. She was convicted of 19 counts in all, including one under the CFAA. Her CFAA conviction stems from using unauthorized software to access a State Department database, which was prohibited by the database's acceptable use policy. The CFAA makes it illegal to intentionally access a computer connected to the Internet without authorization, but it doesnt specify what "without authorization" means. Although the CFAA is aimed at computer break-ins, data theft, and destruction of computer systems, overzealous prosecutors have taken advantage of the law's vague language to bring criminal charges that go beyond Congresss anti-"hacking" purpose. "Congress intended to criminalize the act of accessing a computer that you arent authorized to access, such as breaking into a corporate computer to steal user data or trade secrets or to spread viruses. The law should not be used to turn a violation of an employer's computer use restrictions into a federal crime. Thats what happened here," said EFF Legal Fellow Jamie Williams. In an amicus brief filed Wednesday, EFF told the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals that violating a written policy, which restricted Manning from using unauthorized software to access a State Department database, is not a crime under the CFAA. Because most employers impose one-sided computer use policies on their employees, such an interpretation would potentially turn millions of Americans into criminals on the basis of innocuous activities, like browsing Facebook or viewing online sports scores at work in violation of company policy. "Three federal circuit courts have recognized that violating computer use policies isn't a crime under the CFAA, and we're urging the Army court to follow suit," said EFF Staff Attorney Andrew Crocker. "We have also urged Congress to adopt Aaron's Law, named after late programmer and activist Aaron Swartz, who faced CFAA charges. The law which would ensure that people won't face criminal liability for violating terms of service agreements or other solely contractual agreements." The Center for Democracy & Technology and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers joined EFF in filing the brief. For our amicus brief: https://.eff.org/document/us-v-chelsea-manning-eff-amicus-brief For more information contact: Jamie Lee Williams Frank Stanton Legal Fellow Electronic Frontier Foundation Phone: - Email: jamie@eff.org Website: eff.org Andrew Crocker Staff Attorney Electronic Frontier Foundation Email: andrew@eff.org |