| Tracking the News that Wasn't 
 Censored: The News That Didn't Make The News-And Why Reviewed by Ron Evans It was the 1972 re-election of Richard Nixon that really tore it, 
   according to Carl Jensen. Appalled that his countryfolk could landslide Nixon back into the 
   White House more than four months after the Watergate break-in, 
   Jensen determined to find out whether there might be systematic 
   exclusion of certain issues in the news media. Four years later, 
   in 1976, he inaugurated the research study Project Censored at Sonoma 
   State University, California, where he had been teaching media, 
   sociology and journalism courses since 1973 and today is a professor 
   of Communications Studies. At the heart of Project Censored lies a conviction that the U.S. 
   mass media does shabby service to the citizenry, deliberately or 
   negligently withholding information of vital importance. For the 
   purposes of the Project, censorship was defined as "the suppression 
   of information, whether purposeful or not, by any method - including 
   bias, omission, under-reporting, or self-censorship - which prevents 
   the public from fully knowing what is happening in the world." 
    Each year, Project Censored produces reports citing what are considered 
   the top 10 underpublished stories of the previous year, as Jensen 
   says in the current report "the stories that many Americans 
   have not seen or hear about - but should have."  The basic operation is the same for the parallel projects. In the 
   U.S., students in Jensen's fall seminar do background research and 
   verify the accuracy of nominated stories (about 700 annually) and 
   then a national judging panel (including such as Noam Chomsky, Susan 
   Faludi, John Kenneth Galbraith, Robert MacNeil, Michael Parenti, 
   Susan Sontag and Herbert Schiller) rate the stories, choosing a 
   short list 25 and finally the top 10 neglected stories. Students 
   at the Canadian universities do the backgrounding and verification 
   chores on the 150 nominated items and national judges (such as June 
   Callwood, Francois Demers, Peter Desbarats, Maggie Siggins and Sources 
   publisher Barrie Zwicker) make the selection of the key under-exposed 
   stories. There are some differences, however. The U.S. survey covers all 
   media; in Canada, only the English-language press (though they're 
   planning to extend the net this year to alternate press and recent 
   books). Also, with funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities 
   Research Council, Project Censorship Canada has its own academic 
   purpose, to conduct a systematic "negative content analysis" 
   (i.e. what isn't news) of national news media eventually producing 
   a book-length report. Why do the media fail to cover critical issues consistently and 
   comprehensively? Jensen argues it's not a conspiracy on the part 
   of the media elite, though noting that currently fewer than 20 corporations 
   control most of the mass media.  "Nonetheless, the bottom line explanation for much of the censorship that occurs in the mainstream media is the media's own bottom line. Corporate media executives perceive their primary, and often sole responsibility to be the need to maximize profits, not, as some would have it, inform the public. Many of the stories cited by Project Censored are not in the best financial interests of publishers, owner, stockholders, or advertisers. Equally important, investigative journalism is more expensive than 
   the 'public stenography' school of journalism. And, of course, there 
   is always the 'don't rock the boat' mentality which pervades corporate 
   media boardrooms and filters on down to the newsroom."  Bill Doskoch, in his introduction to Project Censored Canada's 
   first report in 1994, agreed. "There is a growing acceptance 
   of the idea that marketing - what people want to know versus what 
   they need to know - should drive newsroom decision-making. Even 
   worse, the 'wall' between advertising and editorial, once considered 
   an impervious barrier, now appears to be crumbling. This demise 
   is the result of the marketplace's decision that newspapers must 
   be profitable no matter what the economic situation is." But there are other "filters" to block certain issues 
   from the main media advanced in the PCC yearbook including: (On the other hand, in a reprinted speech that serves as a lively 
   introduction to the U.S. PC Yearbook, Jurassic Park 
   author Michael Crichton suggests the mass media may be just another 
   dinosaur ("mediasaurus") on a fast track to extinction 
   thanks to technology. He submits: "Once Al Gore gets the fibre 
   optic highways in place, and the information capacity of the country 
   is where it ought to be, then I will be able, for example, to view 
   any public meeting of Congress on tape. And I will have artificial 
   intelligence agents roaming the databases, downloading stuff I am 
   interested in, and assembling for me a front page, or a nightly 
   new show, that addresses may interests. I'll have the 12 top stories 
   that want; I'll have short summaries available, and I can double 
   click for more detail. How will Peter Jennings or MacNeil-Lehrer 
   or a newspaper compete with that?") The PCC 1995 Yearbook includes an overview of what might 
   be called "state censorship" in Canada in 1994, with references 
   to such disparate events as: The U.S. Yearbook includes a useful "eclectic chronology of 
   Censorship from 605 B.C. (. . . Jehoiakim, the king of Judah, burned 
   Jeremiah's book of prophecies . . .) to 1995 ( . . .Random House 
   announced it would publish A Long Fatal Love Chase, a novel 
   by Louisa May Alcott that had been censored more than a century 
   earlier for being too sensational.)"  Also listed with summaries in each case are 1994's 20 top censored 
   books (all published but with little notice) and the top 10 "junk 
   food" news stories, topped, of course, by the O. J. Simpson 
   case and including among other showbusy items "the British 
   royals." Both the U.S. and Canadian Yearbooks include synopses of all the 
   selected shortlist stories (25 and 17 respectively) and in the U.S. 
   edition the top stories are printed in full, as originally published. 
    Alternative media resource guides are included as appendices in 
   both Yearbooks. The U.S. volume offers 25 pages of listings including 
   broacast and film, electronic new services, periodicals, libraries, 
   columnists and news services; the Canadian lists 87 periodicals. 
    The Top 10 U. S. Censored Stories of 1995 
 The 
   Newsmongers: How the media distort political news (Review) 
 Sources |